“Children think and learn through their bodies”

NOTE: I was thrilled to be invited by Table Talk Math to write a short piece for their weekly newsletter, and they have graciously allowed me to cross post a slightly expanded version here. Check out their resources for supporting math talk at home around the dinner table or any time!


cosmo-heightWhen my daughter was six she was prone to spontaneous bursts of body-based mathematical exploration.  That summer we had two flower plants in our garden that she had nurtured from seed.  By mid-August they had refused to blossom but were still gaining height and had become a daily source of measurement.  She’d compare the plant to her own height, “The cosmo is taller than me!”  As we turned toward autumn she was ecstatic to pronounce, “It’s up to Papa’s chin now!”

That same summer we read the book Sir Circumference the first Round Table a number of times.  She developed a game where she would leap  toward her blow-up wading pool in what she called the “diameter jump.” I held my breath every time as she leaped, finger tips to toes stretched out in one long line to touch the front and back of the pool at the same time, literally flying, flopping almost on the other side of the pool.

straight-lineA year later she was still learning to ride a bike. I took her to the playground which had a big open basketball court. She talked herself through the process: “Okay, all I have to do is think like a straight line in geometry…” and rode back and forth across the basketball courts chanting her new her mantra.

“Think like a straight line, think like a straight line, think like a straight line in geometry.”

When she’d get to the end of the court, she’d get off the bike and turn it around.  Then she figured she could make the turn without getting off. “All I have to do when I get to the end is think like a circle….”

 

Perhaps you’ve also noticed your children or students using their bodies to measure, make size comparisons with other objects, or track growth.  Or maybe you’ve noticed them:

  • walking a pathway along the painted lines on a basketball court
  • crossing a tiled floor on the diagonal by stepping on all the corners, or
  • stepping deliberately over every other floor tile in the grocery store

What can we make of this kind of activity?

Children naturally use their bodies as “thinking tools” to explore and make sense of the world. Studies have emphasized the importance of self-produced movement in the development spatial reasoning which is strongly linked to robust mathematical thinking and problem solving. Both spatial thinking and embodied learning — non-verbal, body-based modes of knowing and reasoning — are especially relevant to the development of mathematical intuition and sense making.

You can support the development of sturdy spatial and math skills in children by:

  1. Having conversations. Use spatial and relational words in the context of talking about everyday activities: over, under, around, through, around, above, below, etc.
  2. Pay attention to how children are using their bodies to interact with the environment, especially in new spaces. The more you notice the more you’ll see (and enjoy) their body-based thinking!
  3. Watch their gestures as they talk about math ideas. Many studies have shown, including the one on which this post’s title is based, that gestures paired with speech can show you a lot about a child’s geometric and spatial knowledge for which they may not yet have words.
  4. Play around! During a visit from a VERY tall Uncle Arlen my six-year-old noticed that he was exactly the same length as the couch! They ended up measuring the sunroom in a hilarious series of units called “Arlens.” The room was almost exactly four Arlens long. They also noticed that one “Arlen” was equivalent to two “Isobel’s” and five lengths of our unamused cat Lucy!

Interested in learning more?

This article on the Mind/Shift blog titled Why Kids Need to Move, Touch and Experience to Learn is an excellent overview of embodied learning.

For some succinct and helpful information about spatial reasoning and how to support and develop students’ spatial thinking in the classroom during math time download this free PDF.


Malke Rosenfeld is a dance teaching artist, author, and presenter whose interests focus on the learning that happens at the intersection of math and the moving body. She delights in creating rich environments in which children and adults can explore, make, play, and talk math based on their own questions and inclinations. Her new book is titled: Math on the Move: Engaging Students in Whole Body Learning (Heinemann 2016)

 

Moving Scale Math on the Hundred Chart

Chapter Three in Math on the Move is titled “Beyond Mnemonics: Getting Starting with Moving-Scale Math.” The chapter is designed as a “zero entry” pool of sorts for whole-body math learning.  You can start at the shallow end and get your feet wet by incorporating students’ whole bodies into familiar math activities you might already be doing at hand or desk scale. Or, if you feel ready, you can jump into the deep end and facilitate a more organized activity.

This chapter is not about replacing an entire math unit with moving-scale, body-based learning or changing your teaching approach overnight. Instead, this is a chance to get a sense of what it feels, looks, and sounds like to engage your students in mathematical sense making by engaging their whole, moving bodies in collaboration with other learners.

The chapter opens with stories from Jenn Kranenburg’s classroom, many of them centered on the large hundred chart she has taped to the floor of her classroom. Today on Twitter she shared a short video of that shows student activity on the “moving scale” hundred chart.  Notice the way this familiar but scaled-up tool opens up whole-class collaboration and conversation, and allows students to fully engage with the spatial nature of the chart.

Updated 10/7, another video from Jenn!

If you’re interested in joining the Facebook discussion group forming around the book please do!  We are learning together and growing a community of practice around meaningful whole-body learning.


Malke Rosenfeld delights in creating rich environments in which children and their adults can explore, make, play, and talk math based on their own questions and inclinations. Her upcoming book, Math on the Move: Engaging Students in Whole Body Learning, will be published by Heinemann in October 2016.

A few thoughts on the difference between memorizing and learning

cropped-img_7144.jpg
Kids making sense of math.

Math on the Move: Engaging Students in Whole Body Learning is organized around three basic ideas:

  1. The body in math learning is best conceived as a thinking tool
  2. Math learning is more than memorization
  3. Amazing learning can happen when the body and math come together in both dance and non-dance settings.

It’s point #2 I’d like to focus on in this post.

A couple years ago Ben Orlin had a fantastic article in the Atlantic titled When Memorization Gets in the Way of Learning. In it, he says:

“What separates memorization from learning is a sense of meaning. When you memorize a fact, it’s arbitrary, interchangeable–it makes no difference to you whether sine of π/2 is one, zero, or a million. But when you learn a fact, it’s bound to others by a web of logic. It could be no other way.”

Most often, the role of the moving body in the classroom, during math time, is that of mnemonic device. Here are some examples of what that might look like:

  • using arms to create symbols for operations, like +, – , and = (focusing on creating representations of the symbols, not expressing their meaning)
  • using hand movements in a song about memorizing a procedure
  • bouncing on an exercise ball while reciting multiplication facts
  • singing a song with an accompanying dance about finding the area of a circle, using movements that bear no relationship to the properties of a circle
  • exploring a math concept such as high versus low in isolation, removed from a narrative context (such as retelling a story) or the larger context of dance learning and making
  • having multiple students become the sides of a triangle by lying on the floor

None of these activities are inherently harmful, some of them may be helpful, and yet, none are at all focused on making sense of mathematical ideas.

In the book I endeavor to explain why we should use the whole, moving body in math learning. I do this by pulling from both research and practice to build a framework for meaningful, body-based math learning. When children harness their innate body knowledge for mathematical sense making, they also harness their whole selves in the pursuit of new ideas and understanding. They develop, communicate, and reason about mathematical ideas both nonverbally and verbally.

Children can make good sense of the world when they get a chance to interact with it, and children are also well able to reason with and about things they observe and do. But they can do this only if they get the chance to do, make, investigate, converse, wonder, build, express, and reflect. Without these kinds of interactions they might still be able to memorize math facts, but memorization would not necessarily mean they would know, for themselves, that something was true.

Ben Orlin said it best:

“Memorization is a frontage road: It runs parallel to the best parts of learning, never intersecting. It’s a detour around all the action, a way of knowing without learning, of answering without understanding.”

I’m SO looking forward to the book being out in another month or so we can grow the practice of meaningful whole-body math learning and teaching together. In the mean time, please feel free to join our book group on Facebook, comprised of educators who want to help their students make sense of math using the original “object to think with” — the whole, moving body.


Malke Rosenfeld delights in creating rich environments in which children and their adults can explore, make, play, and talk math based on their own questions and inclinations. Her upcoming book, Math on the Move: Engaging Students in Whole Body Learning, will be published by Heinemann in October 2016.

TEDx Talk: Jump into math!

My upcoming book reminds us that the body is best positioned as a thinking tool, that math is about more than memorization, and that amazing things can happen when the body and math come together in both dance and non-dance settings.

I gave a TEDx talk in 2013 (before I had even thought to write a book!) which gives a great overview of what Math in Your Feet and whole-body math learning is all about. Math on the Move: Engaging Students in Whole Body Learning will be available in late October and is ready for pre-order.


Malke Rosenfeld delights in creating rich environments in which children and their adults can explore, make, play, and talk math based on their own questions and inclinations. Her upcoming book, Math on the Move: Engaging Students in Whole Body Learning, will be published by Heinemann in Fall 2016.

Math on the Move now ready for pre-order!

cover

“We want math to make sense to our students, and the moving body is a wonderful partner toward that goal.”   —Malke Rosenfeld

Kids love to move. But how do we harness all that kinetic energy effectively for math learning? In Math on the Move, Malke Rosenfeld (creator of Math in Your Feet) shows how pairing math concepts and whole body movement creates opportunities for students to make sense of math in entirely new ways. Malke shares her experience creating dynamic learning environments by:

  • exploring the use of the body as a thinking tool
  • highlighting mathematical ideas that are usefully explored with a moving body
  • providing a range of entry points for learning to facilitate a moving math classroom.

The book is filled with classroom-tested activities and detailed coaching tips, and supported with extensive online video clips.

Read more and/or pre-order by going to the Heinemann site

Join a growing community of practice around whole-body math learning on Facebook!

rb 10a.jpg


Malke Rosenfeld delights in creating rich environments in which children and their adults can explore, make, play, and talk math based on their own questions and inclinations. Her upcoming book, Math on the Move: Engaging Students in Whole Body Learning, will be published by Heinemann in Fall 2016.

What it means when we say “learning through play”

Whole-body math learning should feel playful to the learner. This is a lovely short video about what it means when we say “learning through play.” Instead of building and using the “art machines” shown in this video, children can use their whole bodies as “objects to think with” in similar ways as they work to design, build, explore, and make original and mathematical foot-based dance patterns.


 

Malke Rosenfeld CroppedMalke Rosenfeld is a percussive dance teaching artist, Heinemann author, editor, math explorer, and presenter whose interests focus on the learning that happens at the intersection of math and the moving body. She delights in creating rich environments in which children and adults can explore, make, play, and talk math based on their own questions and inclinations.You can find out more about her work at malkerosenfeld.com,  on Twitter,  Instagram, or Facebook.

Conversation: Getting started with #movingmath

IMG_7210

There’s a lot to think about when creating an environment for meaningful whole body math learning. Luckily, not only is the new book  filled with a wide range of information for implementing this approach in your classroom but we also have our Facebook Book Group as a space for conversations and support.

Recently a question came in on the FB group from a math teacher in the UK.  Jason Gottfried has been working on ideas for adding whole body movement into his teaching. His question and our resulting (slightly edited) conversation illustrate some of the important thinking that goes into creating and assessing activities where children’s whole bodies are engaged in making sense of math ideas.


JASON:
Hi all, I’m planning to experiment with coding and Math in Your Feet type choreography this Sunday. I will get participants to sequence dance “instructions” fairly loosely within beats in a bar and see if they or others can follow the “program”. I should be able to introduce loops and possibly conditional structures also. I’m thinking that instructions can be on cards and laid on a grid representing 4 beat bars. Any ideas about how to make this work out there? Love to hear about any activities like this that you may have done or heard about. Thanks.

MALKE:
The coding connection is a strong one! I think the thing to think about here is that children often need time to get used to the precision footwork (and benefit highly from doing so) before they can move forward toward “operations” on those patterns.  How much choice will they have in either creating or choosing the dance patterns? How much choice will they have in creating the program?

When thinking about programming in particular, and the body’s role in math learning in general, Seymour Papert’s book Mindstorms comes immediately to mind. In the book he reminds us that children have powerful ideas; his work with the LOGO turtle showed that kids will learn and thrive in an environment of exploration. It’s likely your participants will be able to follow along, but it might be way more fun for them, given some basic ideas, to create their own programs for others to “de-bug”.

JASON:
Thanks for the ideas. The idea of debugging a program is a few levels above what I had thought of. Amazing! I’ve currently produced a row of 4 cells to hold the “program” and I have instructions which are pictures of feet positions that children have to get their feet into for that beat. At the festival I’ll be at I usually get children aged 5 – 10 come and engage; I’m hoping I can get them to try to dance one of my programs and then try to arrange one themselves using cards with feet positions already on them and blank cards if needed. I don’t think I’m using actual footwork and I am not sure (but intrigued by the idea of) how to perform operations on the footwork. It’s totally experimental for me. I’ll definitely let you know how it went. Thanks again for the support.

MALKE:
So a simple way to create more exploration/agency would be to give them a program with the cards and then ask them if they want to try making a different “program” using the same cards. Which program “feels” better to execute? Is there anything they wish they could do that they don’t have a card/command for? Maybe have blank cards handy so they can create their own commands? That would be more than enough for a festival — a simple prompt/provocation and a chance to play around with making it different. Can’t wait to hear/see more!

JASON:
That’s it! Linking it to how it feels is great! That feels like the bit I was missing. Thank you. I’ll let you know how it went. Attached a picture of my son playing with the instructions. He had a couple of tries then went for the most complicated dance possible. Another angle I suppose.

Jason 1

Continue reading “Conversation: Getting started with #movingmath”

At the core: Processes, strategies, and practices

IMG_7099

I see a lot of parallels between the work kids do in Math in Your Feet and the Maker Movement. Not only is the human body our original “technology” and the tool with which we learn about the world and develop our cognition from birth, but the “maker” philosophy aligns with my own approach to bringing math and dance together in elementary classrooms.

Mitch Resnick is the LEGO Papert Professor of Learning Research and head of the Lifelong Kindergarten group at the MIT Media Lab. Resnick recently sat down for a conversation with EdSurge. You can read the whole conversation but, below, I’ve focused on his thoughts about the process of making.

When one comes upon a whole classroom of moving bodies dancing in little blue tape squares it’s easy to to miss the forest for the trees, in the sense that it looks a lot like dance and not a whole lot like math. The reality is that math making and dance making have a lot in common. Both share a process by which the learner experiments, asks questions, revises, reflects and…often….has something tangible (an answer or some choreography) to show for it.  Resnick’s comments below resonate with the premise of the new book.


One of the things that appeals to me about the maker movement is that it’s not just about making. That’s an important part of what the maker movement is about. If you give a child a set of step-by-step instructions and build something, in one way, they’ve made something—but that’s not the spirit of the maker movement.

The foundation of Mathematical thinking

 

“Spatial thinking is integral to everyday life. People, natural objects, human-made objects, and human-made structures exist somewhere in space, and the interactions of people and things must be understood in terms of locations, distances, directions, shapes, and patterns.”
-National Research Council

For an overview about how to help students make – and sustain – gains in their learning and understanding of mathematics check out the short but mighty Paying Attention to Spatial Reasoning from the Ontario Ministry of Education. Resting on a rigorous research base, this publication outlines seven foundational principles for focusing on spatial reasoning in the classroom. It also provides useful examples of what paying attention to spatial reasoning can look like in K-12 math classrooms.


Malke Rosenfeld delights in creating rich environments in which children and their adults can explore, make, play, and talk math based on their own questions and inclinations. Her upcoming book, Math on the Move: Engaging Students in Whole Body Learning, will be published by Heinemann in Fall 2016.

 

Some Thoughts on “Hands-On” Math Learning

IMG_7144

Note: This is a re posting of some thoughts I wrote down at my old blog on April 1, 2015, shared here in its entirety.  

Last night on Twitter Michael Pershan asked me to weigh in on hands-on math learning. The request stemmed from a conversation/debate about the various merits of different ways to learn math. The minute I read the question I knew that my answer was going to be more detailed than a response on Twitter would allow. Here are some of my thoughts on the matter.

Continue reading “Some Thoughts on “Hands-On” Math Learning”